<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Brisbane Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brisbanedevelopment.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brisbanedevelopment.com</link>
	<description>Brisbane&#039;s decidated development news website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:27:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Bank 2 &#8211; Labor&#8217;s Grand Plan by viv</title>
		<link>http://brisbanedevelopment.com/south-bank-2-labors-grand-plan/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>viv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brisbanedevelopment.com/?p=1654#comment-488</guid>
		<description>They should create a sister &#039;grand arbour&#039;, in either copy or in homage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should create a sister &#8216;grand arbour&#8217;, in either copy or in homage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Bank 2 &#8211; Labor&#8217;s Grand Plan by Eric</title>
		<link>http://brisbanedevelopment.com/south-bank-2-labors-grand-plan/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 03:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brisbanedevelopment.com/?p=1654#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Southbank 1 is one of Australia&#039;s most successful &#039;private/public&#039; built development. Any repeat of the original Southbank will only be a good thing for Brisbane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Southbank 1 is one of Australia&#8217;s most successful &#8216;private/public&#8217; built development. Any repeat of the original Southbank will only be a good thing for Brisbane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aria&#8217;s New Landmark for South Brisbane by blacknganga</title>
		<link>http://brisbanedevelopment.com/arias-new-landmark-for-south-brisbane/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>blacknganga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brisbanedevelopment.com/wp/?p=79#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Interesting sculptural elements at street level, however,  no amount of decoration can mask the bland modernism that comprises the entire shaft...we have moved away from these types of highrise, for good reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting sculptural elements at street level, however,  no amount of decoration can mask the bland modernism that comprises the entire shaft&#8230;we have moved away from these types of highrise, for good reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on South Bank 2 &#8211; Labor&#8217;s Grand Plan by blacknganga</title>
		<link>http://brisbanedevelopment.com/south-bank-2-labors-grand-plan/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>blacknganga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brisbanedevelopment.com/?p=1654#comment-484</guid>
		<description>this will not be minimalist-style, New Yorkesque, tasteful parkland, it will no doubt be a collection of overpriced &amp; vulgar eateries for the proletariat smashed together with some equally vulgar apartments for the middle class aspirant types. The new park atop the Kangaroo Point cliffs isn&#039;t bad, but we should be quite suspicious of any &quot;cost neutral&quot; development, especially one that is based around so many buildings of historical significance. And as if South Bank 1 wasn&#039;t bad enough by itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this will not be minimalist-style, New Yorkesque, tasteful parkland, it will no doubt be a collection of overpriced &amp; vulgar eateries for the proletariat smashed together with some equally vulgar apartments for the middle class aspirant types. The new park atop the Kangaroo Point cliffs isn&#8217;t bad, but we should be quite suspicious of any &#8220;cost neutral&#8221; development, especially one that is based around so many buildings of historical significance. And as if South Bank 1 wasn&#8217;t bad enough by itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wickham 358 by Prime Space Projects by oikster</title>
		<link>http://brisbanedevelopment.com/wickham-358-by-prime-space-projects/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>oikster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brisbanedevelopment.com/?p=1692#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Cutting edge stuff, and who would not be happy with all the thought put into these developments. Brisbane has come of age, old and new like 2 old friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting edge stuff, and who would not be happy with all the thought put into these developments. Brisbane has come of age, old and new like 2 old friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

